PURPOSE AND RELEVANCE OF ART
PURPOSE AND RELEVANCE OF ART
WHAT IS ART?
Art is a diverse range of human activities and the products of those activities; this article focuses primarily on the visual arts, which includes the creation of images or objects in fields including painting, sculpture, printmaking, photography, and other visual media. Architecture is often included as one of the visual arts; however, like the decorative arts, it involves the creation of objects where the practical considerations of use are essential—in a way that they are usually not for a painting, for example. Music, theatre, film, dance, and other performing arts, as well as literature, and other media such as interactive media are included in a broader definition of art or the arts. Until the 17th century, art referred to any skill or mastery and was not differentiated from crafts or sciences, but in modern usage the fine arts, where aesthetic considerations are paramount, are distinguished from acquired skills in general, and the decorative or applied arts.Art has been characterized in terms of mimesis, expression, communication of emotion, or other values. During the Romantic period, art came to be seen as "a special faculty of the human mind to be classified with religion and science". Though the definition of what constitutes art is disputed and has changed over time, general descriptions mention an idea of human agency and creation through imaginative or technical skill.
The nature of art, and related concepts such as creativity and interpretation, are explored in a branch of philosophy known as aesthetics.
PURPOSE OF ART
Art is created and
enjoyed by many people for many reasons. However, one of the things that art
does is extend and expand our shared common visual language. When new visual
ideas are first introduced by the artist, they are often seen as shocking, and
perhaps even as incomprehensible. However, with time the best and most
effective of these ideas are accepted. There is nothing harder than trying to
grasp what was shocking or illuminating about certain images, or ways of making
images, once the shock is gone, and we have all absorbed this bit of visual
data into our own vocabularies. Artists show us new ways to see familiar
things, and how to interpret new situations and events through various kinds of
visual shorthand. This creation of visual language may be the artist's
intention, or it may be a side effect of other purposes
So what are some of the purposes that art fulfills?
Probably the oldest
purpose of art is as a vehicle for
religious ritual. From the prehistoric
cave paintings of France, to the Sistine
Chapel, art has served religion for centuries the
Church was the primary patron of artists. In traditional societies even today,
the primary purpose of art is religious or ceremonial.
Art may also serve as a commemoration of an important event.
The event may be of major historical importance, such as the coronation of
Josephine by Napoleon as recorded by the artist David, or it may be important only to the participants, like the image of a
wedding or a baptism.
Art has often served
as propaganda or social commentary. Propaganda
images are attempts to persuade us toward particular viewpoints or actions
promoted by public or private institutions such as political parties,
lobbyists, governments, or religious groups. The propaganda purpose may be one
we approve of, such as World War II efforts to get women behind the war effort,
as epitomized in Norman Rockwell's Rosie the Riveter. It might also be a
purpose we disapprove of. In either case, the power of visual images has
frequently been used to persuade masses of people to accept beliefs, take
action, or follow leaders. The artist as social
commentator may simply make us more aware of the human
condition as he/she perceives it, without suggesting particular action. All
societies engage in propaganda, but here are some links to propaganda art
created in China, and by
the Allies during World War I. and during
World War II.
Art may be simply a
means of recording of visual data--
telling the "truth" about what we see. After the Renaissance, artists
became preoccupied with new ways of capturing reality such as the use of linear
perspective, and the realism possible through the use of oil painting
technique. In time, artists like Courbet and Cezanne (and many who followed them) began in various ways to challenge the
basic idea of what it is for an image to be
true and real.
Art can also be seen
as pleasing the eye- creating
beauty. Yet the idea of beauty, like that of truth, has been
challenged in the modern era. At one time, the artist was expected to portray
perfection-- lofty and noble ideals of beauty. Yet as society became more
industrialized and democratic, many thoughtful people began to broaden their
notions of what could be beautiful. For
example, Rembrandt could celebrate the tactile quality of paint and color in his picture of
a side of beef, and Courbet and Millet could see beauty in the life of ordinary peasants.
Art is also a powerful means of storytelling. This
was a common device of religious art of the Middle ages, for example in the frescoes
by Giotto from the Church of San Francesco de Assisi , where sequences of panels were used to tell stories from the
Scriptures or lives of saints. It is also the great gift of Norman Rockwell,
who had the ability to tell powerful and subtle stories about ordinary people
and events, in just one picture. A picture is truly worth a thousand words.
Art can also convey intense emotion. The expressive
power of art can be seen in literal ways in the capturing of facial expression
and body language. Certain religious art, and the works of expressionists such
as Munch or Kirchner are charged with powerful emotions. Picasso, in works such as Guernica (also an example of powerful social commentary and storytelling) is
able to communicate intense emotions. This is accomplished variously by use of
dramatic or exaggerated color, light, form, and/or other elements.
In any
case, one of the primary functions of art is to interpret the subject matter at hand. Subject
matter does not change all that much over time. Although new subject matter has
evolved, the human condition, nature, and events still continue to capture the
attention of artists. The media used have changed relatively little; though new
materials have appeared in this century, the conventional media continue to be
used. Nor can we say that the quality or artistic merit of art works has
increased or lessened with time. However, throughout the course of history as
society has changed, so also has the interpretation of specific subject matter.
A portrait executed by Matisse in 1907 could not be confused with one done by van Dyck in the 1630s.Even landscape is reinterpreted in the
context of a changing world. Each work is an expression of the subject in the
context of the values, culture, and events of its specific era.
Non-motivated functions of art
The non-motivated purposes of art are those that are
integral to being human, transcend the individual, or do not fulfill a specific
external purpose. In this sense, Art, as creativity, is something humans must
do by their very nature (i.e., no other species creates art), and is
therefore beyond utility.
Motivated functions of art
- Basic human instinct for harmony, balance, rhythm.
Art at this level is not an action or an object, but an internal
appreciation of balance and harmony (beauty), and therefore an aspect of
being human beyond utility.
- Experience of the mysterious.
Art provides a way to experience one's self in relation to the universe.
This experience may often come unmotivated, as one appreciates art, music
or poetry.
- Expression of the imagination.
Art provide a means to express the imagination in non-grammatic ways that
are not tied to the formality of spoken or written language. Unlike words,
which come in sequences and each of which have a definite meaning, art
provides a range of forms, symbols and ideas with meanings that are
malleable.
- Ritualistic and symbolic functions. In
many cultures, art is used in rituals, performances and dances as a
decoration or symbol. While these often have no specific utilitarian
(motivated) purpose, anthropologists know that they often serve a purpose
at the level of meaning within a particular culture. This meaning is not
furnished by any one individual, but is often the result of many
generations of change, and of a cosmological relationship within the
culture.
"Imitation, then, is one instinct of our
nature. Next, there is the instinct for 'harmony' and rhythm, meters being
manifestly sections of rhythm. Persons, therefore, starting with this natural
gift developed by degrees their special aptitudes, till their rude
improvisations gave birth to Poetry." -Aristotle
"The most beautiful thing we can
experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and
science." -Albert Einstein
"Jupiter's eagle [as an example of art]
is not, like logical (aesthetic) attributes of an object, the concept of the
sublimity and majesty of creation, but rather something else – something that
gives the imagination an incentive to spread its flight over a whole host of
kindred representations that provoke more thought than admits of expression in
a concept determined by words. They furnish an aesthetic idea, which serves the
above rational idea as a substitute for logical presentation, but with the
proper function, however, of animating the mind by opening out for it a
prospect into a field of kindred representations stretching beyond its
ken." -Immanuel Kant
"Most scholars who deal with rock
paintings or objects recovered from prehistoric contexts that cannot be
explained in utilitarian terms and are thus categorized as decorative, ritual
or symbolic, are aware of the trap posed by the term 'art'." -Silva
Tomaskova.
Motivated functions of art
Motivated purposes of art refer to intentional, conscious
actions on the part of the artists or creator. These may be to bring about
political change, to comment on an aspect of society, to convey a specific
emotion or mood, to address personal psychology, to illustrate another
discipline, to (with commercial arts) to sell a product, or simply as a form of
communication.
5.Art for social inquiry, subversion and/or anarchy. While similar to art for political change, subversive or deconstructivist art may seek to question aspects of society without any specific political goal. In this case, the function of art may be simply to criticize some aspect of society.
6. Art for propaganda, or commercialism.
Art is often utilized as a form of propaganda,
and thus can be used to subtly influence popular conceptions or mood. In a
similar way, art that tries to sell a product also influences m and
emotion. In both cases, the purpose of art here is to subtly manipulate
the viewer into a particular emotional or psychological response toward a
particular idea or object.
- Communication.
Art, at its simplest, is a form of communication. As most forms of
communication have an intent or goal directed toward another individual,
this is a motivated purpose. Illustrative arts, such as scientific
illustration, are a form of art as communication. Maps are another
example. However, the content need not be scientific. Emotions, moods and
feelings are also communicated through art.
"[Art is a set of] artefacts or images
with symbolic meanings as a means of communication." -Steve Mithen
- Art as entertainment.
Art may seek to bring about a particular emotion or mood, for the purpose
of relaxing or entertaining the viewer. This is often the function of the
art industries of Motion Pictures and Video Games.
- The Avante-Garde. Art for political
change. One of the defining functions of early twentieth
century art has been to use visual images to bring about political change.
Art movements that had this goal—Dadaism, Surrealism, Russian
Constructivism, and Abstract Expressionism, among others—are collectively
referred to as the avante-garde arts.
"By contrast, the realistic attitude,
inspired by positivism, from Saint Thomas Aquinas to Anatole France, clearly
seems to me to be hostile to any intellectual or moral advancement. I loathe
it, for it is made up of mediocrity, hate, and dull conceit. It is this
attitude which today gives birth to these ridiculous books, these insulting
plays. It constantly feeds on and derives strength from the newspapers and
stultifies both science and art by assiduously flattering the lowest of tastes;
clarity bordering on stupidity, a dog's life." -André Breton (Surrealism)[35]
4. Art for psychological and healing purposes. Art is also used by art therapists, psychotherapists and clinical
psychologists as art therapy. The Diagnostic Drawing
Series, for example, is
used to determine the personality and emotional functioning of a
patient. The end product is not the principal goal in this case, but rather a
process of healing, through creative acts, is sought. The resultant piece of
artwork may also offer insight into the troubles experienced by the subject and
may suggest suitable approaches to be used in more conventional forms of
psychiatric therapy.5.Art for social inquiry, subversion and/or anarchy. While similar to art for political change, subversive or deconstructivist art may seek to question aspects of society without any specific political goal. In this case, the function of art may be simply to criticize some aspect of society.

7. Art as a fitness indicator. It
has been argued that the ability of the human brain by far exceeds what
was needed for survival in the ancestral environment. One evolutionary psychology explanation
for this is that the human brain and associated traits (such as artistic
ability and creativity) are the human equivalent of the peacock's
tail. The purpose of the male peacock's extravagant tail has been argued
to be to attract females (see also Fisherian
runaway and handicap
principle). According to this theory superior
execution of art was evolutionary important because it attract mates.
- WHY
THE QUESTION OF RELEVANCE? In
developed economies of the world where the basic necessities of life seem to
have been met, the question as to whether the arts are relevant or not to
practical living is no longer an issue. Thousands of American citizens would
troop down to the auditorium in Bard College to hear Chinua Achebe's reading of his Things Fall Apart, not minding that they have heard the same reading over and over again, not minding that the book is over fifty years old;
the same way the English audience would cluster at The Royal Theatre in London
to watch the presentation of Wole Soyinka's The Trials of Brother Jero or any
of the plays of Shakespeare, not minding that Shakespeare wrote centuries ago.
In the same vein, even though Leonardo Da Vinci and Michelangelo are long dead
and gone, Italians would pay their very last lira to watch an exhibition of
their paintings.
- In our own context, economic hardship and the search for basic necessities of life have meant that only a few have had the time to appreciate the arts for what they are worth. In other words, the problem is not whether the arts are relevant or not, for it is not in doubt that the arts are relevant to practical living as much as any profession, or even more so. The real problem lies in the fact that people are too hungry or too busy to see the real worth of the arts. A man who lives on a monthly salary of paltry ten thousand naira, with seven mouths to feed, and so many other family problems to solve may not easily pay five hundred naira just to watch a drama presentation; a Nigerian graduate who has walked the streets of Abuja, Lagos, or Port Harcourt in search of a job for three years without success would know what to do with money rather than spend it on a piece of landscape paintings; likewise, a young man who has had nothing to eat for days, and has no hope of where the next meal is coming from, would not possibly be coordinated enough to read, not to talk of appreciating, works of poetry. If arts cannot satisfy hunger or thirst, can they still be said to be relevant?
Comments
Post a Comment